|
June 16, 2004
|
||||||
ACCESS: FIGHT FOR RIGHT TO COVER NEWS IS KEY ISSUE FOR ALL EDITORS
We are quickly losing our ability to independently gather the news. If these groups figure out that they can keep us out of events, and then afterwards hand us photos of what they want us to see, we are failing to provide our readers with an independently produced view of the scene. Newspapers are already in a compromised position because we use handout photos from film companies, theaters and record companies in our feature sections. I suspect we do this because it is cheap and convenient. So if it's okay in our features sections, why is it not okay to use handout photos in our news sections? When Saddam Hussein was captured last year, virtually every newspaper used the U.S. Army handout photos. The news-value of the photo seemed to outweigh any reservations about who shot it. But why could the U.S. government not provide accredited journalists with access to Saddam Hussein?
The White House entrusted reporters and photographers with information and access that could have endangered the safety of the leader of the free world when he made a risky Thanksgiving trip to Baghdad. Yet they wouldn't trust a journalist with a photo opportunity of the defeated and bedraggled dictator of Iraq. Both subjects were surrounded by American soldiers, so why was one accessible to the accredited press and the other one not? And how come we didn't make any noise about that? One editor at my paper suggested that one of the problems with the tiger photos is that the wire services moved them at all. If they had not moved them, he argued, then no paper could have run them, and we would not have found ourselves divided as a group. We need to guard against the increasing use of handout photos because it erodes our access to newsworthy events. The more we use handout photos, the greater the likelihood we will be forced out of similar events in the future. As photo managers we need to raise awareness of this problem among the top decision makers in our newsrooms and persuade them to aggressively pursue access restrictions. We also need to convince them that the use of handout photos in our newspapers poses a threat to our ability to effectively do our jobs in the future. If we don't stop this trend, we may soon find ourselves permanently on the outside, unable to look in. COORDINATION: IDEAS TO HELP DESIGNERS AND PHOTOGRAPHERS COMMUNICATE Organized by APPM president Sherman Williams of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, "10 Things a Designer Should know about Photography and Picture Editing/10 Things a Picture Editor Should Know About Design" was one of three visual oriented sessions at the May 20-21 Wisconsin APME/APPM meeting. The session featured a panel of designers and photo editors and discussions prior to the meeting indicated a lively and productive discussion. Panelist Dwight Nale, photo editor of the Appleton (Wis.) Post-Crescent, noted "the biggest thing is the communication, because sometimes in the communication business we don't communicate enough." This communication, he said, needs to incorporate sensitivity on the part of the designer that what the designer may spend an hour putting together is the result of several weeks of effort by both the writer and the photographer. But photographers, Nale said, need to remember the pressure designers are under. "We as photographers have to understand what designers do," he said, adding that photographers shouldn't feel entitled to have every photo used. But, he adds, "A big thing designers need to know is that photographers want to be part of the process." Bill Olmstead, photo editor of the Janesville (Wis.) Gazette and a panel member, adds that photographers should not come to the process expecting to have problems with page designers. "A lot of photographers just assume page designers are going to do bad things to them," he said. Olmstead adds that designers need to recognize that "photographers, like any other caring person, are highly invested in their work and hope to see it used well." Lonnie Turner, features design editor at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, begins her list of 10 things with "Designers LOVE great photography." She reminds photo editors: "The more powerful the photo is, the easier our job becomes. Good design frames great photography. Give us powerful photos, and there will be no need to pull out 'our bag of tricks.'" Olmstead would remind designers that it is possible to play photos too large as well as too small, and he has seen detail shots used much large than ever intended. He also asks designers, "When presented with a group of images, pick the most important photographs, what directly relates to the story." Turner and Nale both agree that photographers should remember to turn the camera and offer designers vertical images in photo packages. Turner adds, "Want to get on a designer's good side and have photography more prominent on cover pages? Give us horizontal and vertical options to design with. You will have a friend for life!" Designers should ask questions of photographers, Olmstead said, adding "Photographs are finished pieces of work. Like a finished story you can trim them, but you don't crop it severely without getting someone else involved. You wouldn't cut 30 or 40 percent of a story without involving and editor or the reporter." He also notes it is reasonable for designers working on deadlines to ask photographers to shoot to a shape, but would ask that the size not be a restrictive. Photographers need to understand the newspaper's demands and respond appropriately. Finally, in her list, Turner addresses the contentious issue of "block outs" or as photo editors sometimes refer to them, COBs (cutout backgrounds). While she argues that sometimes the block out is the best use of space, she notes it works best when, "The idea of photographing the subject of the story and blocking the image out for design purposes has been discussed and agreed upon by the photo editor, photographer and designer in advance." It's all about communication, as Nale says. You can see Lonnie Turner's complete list at www.apphotomanagers.org.
TRAINING: REGISTER NOW FOR FREE SESSION IN SAN FRANCISCO WEB: CHECK OUT NEW APPM WEB SITE
MEMBER COOPERATION: AP MEMBERS CITED FOR SHARING NEWS, PHOTOS, TIPS
Also, congratulations to Tom Fox of The Dallas Morning News for contributing the May Member Showcase Photo of the Month. When heavy rain from a passing thunderstorm briefly halted play during the Big 12 Conference baseball tournament, Fox found action of a different sort in the stands where 13-year-old Baskin Betsworth sat underneath a stream of runoff water from the upper deck, much to the bemusement of other fans seeking shelter underneath. For his winning monthly contribution, Fox is eligible for the annual APME Member Showcase Photo Award, which includes recognition at the annual conference and a cash prize.
Previous issues:
|
||||||
| ABOUT US: APME Update is published weekly by the Associated Press Managing Editors. It is edited by Elaine Kulhanek of the Great Falls (Mont.) Tribune. Send submissions by e-mail to ekulhanek@greatfal.gannett. Our contributors welcome your suggestions and news tips related to their Update topics. Contributors include Ken Sands of The Spokesman-Review, Spokane, Wash., online; Carol Nunnelley of the Credibility Roundtables project; Darrell Hoemann, of The News-Gazette, Champaign, Ill., a member of the Associated Press Photo Managers; Scott Angus of the Janesville (Wis.) Gazette, APME state associations, and Logan Molen of The Bakersfield (Calif.) Californian, APME readership committee. |